- Consumers' Mobility, Expenditure and Online-Offline Substitution Response to COVID-19: Evidence from French Transaction Data - David Bounie, Youssouf Camara and John W. Galbraith (SSRN)
- It Matters that Most COVID Layoffs in March were Furloughs - Erica Groshen
- COVID-19 infection externalities: Herd immunity versus containment strategies Zachary Bethune and Anton Korinek (VoxEU)
- After lockdowns, economic sunlight or a long hard slog? - Gavyn Davies
- Italy’s corporate reopening stirs fears over more deaths - FT
- Will the Bank of England announce more QE? - FT
- Two experts debate the long-term impact on inflation of the Covid-19 rescue packages
- - FT
- Countries That Kept a Lid on Coronavirus Look to Each Other to Revive Their Economies - WSJ
- Italians Prepare to Return to Work, If They Can Find Child-Care - WSJ
- US state pension system hit hard by coronavirus pandemic - FT
Gavyn Davies at the Financial Times reflects on the growing pessimism of Central Banks regarding the growth potential of advanced economies. In the US, the Euro area or the UK, central banks are reducing their estimates of the output gap. They now think about some of the recent output losses as permanent as opposed to cyclical. It output is not far from what we consider to be potential, there is less need for central banks to act and it is more likely that we will see an earlier normalization of monetary policy towards a neutral stance. Why did they change their mind? Is this evidence consistent with the standard economic models that we use to think about cyclical developments? Measuring potential output or the slack in the economy has always been challenging. One can rely on models that capture the factors that drive potential output (such as the capital stock or productivity or demographics) or one can look at more specific indicators of idle capacity, such as capacity utilization or...
Comments
Post a Comment