- Health versus wealth: On the distributional effects of controlling a pandemic - Jonathan Heathcote, Andrew Glover, Dirk Krueger, Víctor Ríos-Rull (VoxEU)
- The deflation threat from the virus will be long lasting - Gavyn Davies (FT)
- CBO’s Current Projections of GDP, Unemployment and Federal Deficit - Congressional Budget Office
- Coronavirus Projected to Trigger Worst Economic Downturn Since 1940s - WSJ
- Cash in the time of corona - Andreas Joseph, Christiane Kneer, Neeltje van Horen, Jumana Saleheen (VoxEU)
- Reweaving the social fabric after the crisis - Andrew Haldane (FT)
- German shops reopen but celebrations in Berlin muted - FT.com
- We need a better head start for the next pandemic - Mehdi Shiva (VoxEU)
- Forecasting recoveries is difficult: Evidence from past recessions - Zidong An, Prakash Loungani (VoxEU)
- Will central banks serve up fresh stimulus? - FT.com
Gavyn Davies at the Financial Times reflects on the growing pessimism of Central Banks regarding the growth potential of advanced economies. In the US, the Euro area or the UK, central banks are reducing their estimates of the output gap. They now think about some of the recent output losses as permanent as opposed to cyclical. It output is not far from what we consider to be potential, there is less need for central banks to act and it is more likely that we will see an earlier normalization of monetary policy towards a neutral stance. Why did they change their mind? Is this evidence consistent with the standard economic models that we use to think about cyclical developments? Measuring potential output or the slack in the economy has always been challenging. One can rely on models that capture the factors that drive potential output (such as the capital stock or productivity or demographics) or one can look at more specific indicators of idle capacity, such as capacity utilization or...
Comments
Post a Comment