- How the Impact of Social Distancing Ripples through the Economy - St Louis Fed
- How development policy financing can support COVID-19 response and preserve human capital - World Bank Blogs
- Thoughts from a total lockdown in Argentina - Federico Sturzenegger (VoxEU.org)
- Covid Economics: Vetted and Real-Time Papers (2nd issue) - CEPR
- COVID-19: The self-employed are hardest hit and least supported - Bruegel
- Africa’s COVID-19 Budget Crunch - Project Syndicate
- How sick might banks get? - The Economist
- French central banker floats printing money to hand to companies - FT.com
- The G20 should do more to harness the IMF and World Bank - Simeon Djankov (PIIE)
- Designing the fiscal response to the COVID-19 pandemic - Olivier Blanchard (PIIE)
- The World After Covid-19: Inequality Within Rich Countries Will Increase, Globalization Will Reverse, Politics Will Remain Turbulent - Branko Milanovic (ProMarket)
- Trade and the COVID-19 crisis in developing countries - VoxEU.org
- Pandemics and asymmetric shocks: Lessons from the history of plagues - VoxEU.org
- Economic policy and financial market expectations during COVID-19 - VoxEU.org
- India’s lockdown - VoxEU.org
- Eurozone’s two biggest economies sink into historic recessions - FT.com
- The danger in the global coronavirus recovery will be inertia - Philip Stephens
- For the poorest countries, the full danger from coronavirus is only just coming into view - World Bank Blogs
- Fed officials identified US outlook as ‘profoundly uncertain’ - FT.com
- Many economists defend disaster profiteers. They are wrong - The Economist
- Coronabonds: no-go zone - FT.com
- Bank of England to directly finance extra government spending - FT.com
- Coronavirus and Trade - NPR.org
- How Will We Know When It’s Time to Reopen the Nation? - NYTimes.com
- ‘Coronabonds’ Could Bail Europe Out, Tie It Together - Washington Post
- Italy’s Debt Is Less Terrifying Than It Looks - Washington Post
Gavyn Davies at the Financial Times reflects on the growing pessimism of Central Banks regarding the growth potential of advanced economies. In the US, the Euro area or the UK, central banks are reducing their estimates of the output gap. They now think about some of the recent output losses as permanent as opposed to cyclical. It output is not far from what we consider to be potential, there is less need for central banks to act and it is more likely that we will see an earlier normalization of monetary policy towards a neutral stance. Why did they change their mind? Is this evidence consistent with the standard economic models that we use to think about cyclical developments? Measuring potential output or the slack in the economy has always been challenging. One can rely on models that capture the factors that drive potential output (such as the capital stock or productivity or demographics) or one can look at more specific indicators of idle capacity, such as capacity utilization or...
Comments
Post a Comment