- Sectoral effects of social distancing - Barrot, Grassi and Sauvagnat
- Preparedness can pay off quickly: Disaster financing and COVID-19 - World Bank Blogs
- The East-West Divide in COVID-19 Control - Jeffrey D. Sachs (PS)
- Why testing a representative sample of the population must be done now - VoxEU.org
- The Real Economic Fallout of COVID-19 - Dennis Snower
- The large and unequal impact of COVID-19 on workers - VoxEU.org
- Trump’s ineptness may prolong the recession - The Washington Post
- Who still thinks austerity was a good idea? - Simon Wren-Lewis
- Economists are united in support of the coronavirus lockdown - Martin Sandbu (FT.com)
- We must focus attention on our next steps - Martin Wolf (FT.com)
- How and When to Restart the Economy: a Webinar with Nobel Laureate Paul Romer - Pro Market
- What it will take to save the economy from COVID-19 - Olivier Blanchard
- The G20 should expand trade to help developing countries overcome COVID-19 - PIIE
- The Greater Trade Collapse of 2020: Learnings from the 2008-09 Great Trade Collapse Richard Baldwin (VoxEU.org)
- The economic, political and moral case for a European fiscal policy response to COVID-19 - Thorsten Beck (VoxEU.org)
- Three important questions to answer about U.S. financial stabilization policies amid the coronavirus recession - Equitable Growth
- Will COVID-19 Derail the African Century? - Michael Wilkerson (PS)
- ECB announces package of temporary collateral easing measures - ECB
- Eurogroup fails to land deal on coronavirus economic response - FT.com
- How Do You Lift a Covid-19 Lockdown? Ask Austria - The Washington Post
- Government and Businesses Turn Attention to Eventual Reopening of $22 Trillion U.S. Economy WSJ.com
- Nearly a Third of U.S. Renters Didn't Pay April Rent - WSJ.com
- EU warns of global bidding war for medical equipment - FT.com
- Arab world’s middle-income nations face tough coronavirus choices - FT.com
- Supply chains need some love during the coronavirus pandemic - FT.com
- Brussels seeks EU budget overhaul to boost post-pandemic recovery - FT.com
Gavyn Davies at the Financial Times reflects on the growing pessimism of Central Banks regarding the growth potential of advanced economies. In the US, the Euro area or the UK, central banks are reducing their estimates of the output gap. They now think about some of the recent output losses as permanent as opposed to cyclical. It output is not far from what we consider to be potential, there is less need for central banks to act and it is more likely that we will see an earlier normalization of monetary policy towards a neutral stance. Why did they change their mind? Is this evidence consistent with the standard economic models that we use to think about cyclical developments? Measuring potential output or the slack in the economy has always been challenging. One can rely on models that capture the factors that drive potential output (such as the capital stock or productivity or demographics) or one can look at more specific indicators of idle capacity, such as capacity utilization or...
Comments
Post a Comment