- Three important questions to answer about global financial stabilization policies amid the coronavirus recession - Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas
- We need to let economic data guide further economic policy responses to COVID-19 - Jay Shambaugh (Brookings)
- A policy framework for mitigating the economic impact of COVID-19 - Izvorski et at (Brookings)
- Urban Density Is Not an Enemy in the Coronavirus Fight: Evidence from China - Wanli Fang and Sameh Wahba (World Bank)
- The coronavirus is not gender-blind, nor should we be - Grown and Sánchez-Páramo (World Bank)
- Now is not the time? - Simon Wren-Lewis
- Corona shock (UK effects of COVID-19) - Cook, Hollowood and Newell
- Misinformation During a Pandemic - Bursztyn, Rao, Roth and Yanagizawa-Drott (Becker Friedman Institute)
- The European response to the Covid-19 crisis: A pragmatic proposal to break the impass - Roberto Perotti (VoxEU.org)
- Jobs at risk: Policy responses to COVID-19 in emerging markets - Çağatay Bircan, Zsoka Koczan, Alexander Plekhanov (VoxEU.org)
- Global Behaviors and Perceptions in the COVID-19 Pandemic - Caria et al (CEPR DP)
- A Model of Asset Price Spirals and Aggregate Demand Amplification of a "Covid-19" Shock - Caballero and Simsek (CEPR DP)
- Optimal COVID-19 Quarantine and Testing Policies - Piguillem and Shi
- Covid Economics: Vetted and Real-Time Papers (Issue 7)- CEPR
- Repair and reconstruct: A Recovery Initiative - Agnès Bénassy-Quéré et al (VoxEU.org)
- The Coronavirus Crisis Has Exposed Private Equity’s Unsustainable Business Model - Matt Stoller (ProMarket)
- Back to Work? The Political Preparation for “Phase 2” of the Pandemic Is a Matter of Trust - Benmelech, Sapienza and Zingales (ProMarket)
- We’re all in this together: Collective action and trust in the age of coronavirus - Davenport, Kunicova and Kallaur (World Bank)
- A Global Crisis Like No Other Needs a Global Response Like No Other - Kristalina Georgieva (IMF)
- The EU Should Issue Perpetual Bonds - George Soros (PS)
- Monetary Finance Is Here - Adair Turner (PS)
- Global Supply Chain Disruptions: A Webinar With Penny Goldberg - ProMarket
- China and Africa’s debt: Yes to relief, no to blanket forgiveness - Yun Sun (Brookings)
- The decline in industrial production: One for the ages - The FRED Blog
Gavyn Davies at the Financial Times reflects on the growing pessimism of Central Banks regarding the growth potential of advanced economies. In the US, the Euro area or the UK, central banks are reducing their estimates of the output gap. They now think about some of the recent output losses as permanent as opposed to cyclical. It output is not far from what we consider to be potential, there is less need for central banks to act and it is more likely that we will see an earlier normalization of monetary policy towards a neutral stance. Why did they change their mind? Is this evidence consistent with the standard economic models that we use to think about cyclical developments? Measuring potential output or the slack in the economy has always been challenging. One can rely on models that capture the factors that drive potential output (such as the capital stock or productivity or demographics) or one can look at more specific indicators of idle capacity, such as capacity utilization or...
Comments
Post a Comment